4.5 Article

Risk of low-energy fracture in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis of observational studies

期刊

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 3113-3121

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4183-0

关键词

Low-energy fracture; Meta-analysis; Type 2 diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Summary In this meta-analysis, evidence of an association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and low-energy fractures has been evaluated including 12 observational studies. The results suggested that T2DM patients had an enhanced risk of low-energy fractures. Introduction Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients have been shown to be at enhanced risk of fracture injury, but less is known about low-energy fractures among patients with T2DM. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of 12 observational studies identified in Medline and EMBASE that included 938,742 participants, including 30,827 low-energy fracture cases. The incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of low-energy fractures were determined using a random-effects model. Results The IRRs of low-energy fracture for men and women were 1.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-2.00; p = 0.096) and 1.22 (95% CI, 1.09-1.35; p = 0.000), respectively, and the overall IRR was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.12-1.35; p = 0.000). The IRRs for hip and vertebral fractures were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.02-1.15; p = 0.007) and 1.21 (95% CI, 0.98-1.48; p = 0.073), respectively. The IRRs of low-energy fracture in case-control, prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies were 1.18 (95% CI, 0.81-1.72; p = 0.380), 1.17 (95% CI, 1.05-1.32, p = 0.006), 1.15 (95% CI, 1.021.29; p = 0.020), and 1.60 (95% CI, 1.21-2.12; p = 0.001), respectively. The IRRs of low-energy fracture for less than 5 years, 5 to 10 years, and more than 10 years were 1.30 (95%, CI 1.13-1.50; p = 0.000), 1.05 (95% CI, 1.03-1.08; p = 0.000), and 1.19 (95% CI, 1.00-1.41; p = 0.049), respectively. Conclusions Patients with T2DM had a greater risk of low-energy fracture especially of the hip, compared with that in non-diabetic subjects. However, since according to our funnel plot a publication bias may be present and due to study heterogeneity as well as the limited number of publications, the finding needs to be interpreted with caution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据