4.7 Article

Colloidal bismuth subcitrate impedes proton entry into Helicobacter pylori and increases the efficacy of growth-dependent antibiotics

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 922-933

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.13346

关键词

-

资金

  1. UCLA CDI
  2. USVA [2I01BX001006]
  3. [K08DK100661]
  4. [R01DK105156-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundSuccessful eradication of Helicobacter pylori is becoming more difficult, mainly due to emerging antibiotic resistance. Treatment regimens containing bismuth have increased efficacy, but the mechanism is unknown. Helicobacter pylori is a neutralophile adapted to survive the acidic gastric environment via acid acclimation, but demonstrates more robust growth at neutral pH. Many antibiotics used to treat H. pylori rely on bacterial growth. AimTo investigate the mechanism of increased efficacy of bismuth-containing H. pylori treatment regimens. MethodsRNAseq and qPCR, urease activity in permeabilised and intact bacteria, internal pH and membrane potential were measured with and without colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS). Bacterial survival was assessed with CBS and/or ampicillin. ResultsGenes involved with metabolism and growth were upregulated in the presence of CBS at acidic pH. Urease activity of permeabilised H. pylori at pH 7.4 and 4.5 decreased in the presence of CBS, but intact urease activity decreased only at acidic pH. The fall in cytoplasmic pH with external acidification was diminished by CBS. The increase in membrane potential in response to urea addition at acidic medium pH was unaffected by CBS. The impact of CBS and ampicillin on H. pylori survival was greater than either agent alone. ConclusionsBismuth is not acting directly on urease or the urea channel. Colloidal bismuth subcitrate impedes proton entry into the bacteria, leading to a decrease in the expected fall in cytoplasmic pH. With cytoplasmic pH remaining within range for increased metabolic activity of a neutralophile, the efficacy of growth-dependent antibiotics is augmented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据