4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Enhanced Precombustion Capture of Carbon Dioxide by Gas Hydrate Formation in Water-in-Oil Emulsions

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 2971-2978

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00051

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education Innovation Research Team [IRT13043]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB239206]
  3. Key Laboratory of Low-Grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems of Ministry of Education [LLEUTS-201407]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we reported enhanced kinetics of gas hydrate formation in water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions for the precombustion capture of carbon dioxide. The experiments were carried out at 274.2 K and in the pressure range of 3.0-6.0 MPa. The parameters of induction time, gas uptake, rate of hydrate growth, CO, recovery, and separation factor were determined to evaluate the performance of the W/O emulsions for CO, capture from a fuel gas (40 mol % CO2/H-2). It was found that shorter induction time and higher gas uptake were obtained while the water oil volume ratio (WOR) was reduced from 70% to 20%, and gas hydrates were observed to grow faster at low WORs. The CO, recovery and CO, concentration in the hydrate phase decreased with WOR decreasing from 70% to 20%. At a fixed WOR, higher pressure resulted in shorter induction time and higher gas uptake, but CO, concentration in the hydrate phase decreased. The highest value of CO, concentration in the hydrate phase achieved 84 mol % at 3.0 MPa and WOR = 70%, and the highest value of gas uptake obtained in W/O emulsions was 39.5 mmol of gas/mol of water at 3.0 MPa and WOR = 20%. This gas uptake was much higher than that obtained in stirred reactors in the presence of CP or THF and was comparable with that obtained in the fixed bed of silica sand in the presence of THF or TBAB. The result indicated that the W/O emulsions employed in this work are a viable option to enhance hydrate formation for the precombustion capture of carbon dioxide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据