4.1 Review

Major new review of global evidence on diet, nutrition and physical activity: A blueprint to reduce cancer risk

期刊

NUTRITION BULLETIN
卷 43, 期 3, 页码 269-283

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nbu.12345

关键词

cancer; diet; nutrition; obesity; physical activity; policy

资金

  1. WCRF Network of cancer prevention charities
  2. WCRF UK
  3. AICR
  4. Wereld Kanker Onderzoek Fonds (WKOF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The number of cancer cases is increasing. Despite advances in treatment, cancer causes one in six deaths worldwide and has overtaken cardiovascular disease as the leading cause of death in many parts of the world. Yet around 40% of cancer cases are preventable through lifestyle changes. The newly published Third Expert Report, Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Cancer: A Global Perspective, from World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR), provides a comprehensive analysis of the worldwide body of evidence on preventing and surviving cancer through diet, nutrition and physical activity. Using the most meticulous methods, evidence from studies on 17 cancers and 51 million people - including 3.5 million cancer cases - has been reviewed. The findings have been used to produce the latest global Cancer Prevention Recommendations - which together form a blueprint to prevent cancer that people can trust - and to identify priority areas for future research. The Report, summarised in this article, ensures that people are equipped with the knowledge needed to prioritise cancer prevention - be they researchers, medical or health professionals, policymakers, civil society organisations (including cancer organisations), the media or people looking to reduce their own risk of cancer or live well after a diagnosis. A whole-of-government, whole-of-society approach is necessary to create environments for people and communities that are conducive to following the WCRF/AICR Recommendations in order to reduce the number of deaths from preventable cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据