4.2 Article

Combined effects of workplace bullying and perceived organizational support on employee behaviors: does resource availability help?

期刊

ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 654-668

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2018.1521516

关键词

Workplace bullying; perceived organizational support; organizational retaliatory behaviors; job performance; organizational citizenship behaviors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objective: This research examines the detrimental effects of workplace bullying as a social stressor on employees' job performance, organizational retaliatory behaviors, and organizational citizenship behaviors and how the availability of support can reduce the negative impact of bullying. Using social exchange theory and the conservation of resources theory as theoretical frameworks, we propose that workplace bullying drains personal resources, leading to reduced job performance, low citizenship behaviors, and increased organizational retaliatory behaviors. We also propose that perceived organizational support acts as moderator, such that it reduces the detrimental effects of bullying on employee behaviors. Research Design and Methods: We tested our hypotheses in two field studies (N=478 and N=395) conducted in Pakistan. Results: The results of both studies supported the assertion that workplace bullying exacerbates employees' job performance, reduces organizational citizenship behaviors and intensifies organizational retaliatory behaviors. The idea that perceived organizational support would moderate the bullying-work behavior relationships found mixed support. While perceptions of organizational support reinforced the bullying-job performance and bullying-retaliatory behaviors relationships, it did not moderate the bullying-citizenship behaviors relationship in the suggested direction. Conclusion: The findings show that workplace bullying leads to more organizational citizenship behaviors when employee's perceptions of organizational support is high.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据