4.7 Article

Scaling Relations Associated with Millimeter Continuum Sizes in Protoplanetary Disks

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 865, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadd9f

关键词

circumstellar matter; planets and satellites: formation; protoplanetary disks

资金

  1. Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Latino Initiative Program
  2. Smithsonian Institution
  3. Academia Sinica

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a combined, homogenized analysis of archival Submillimeter Array (SMA) and Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations of the spatially resolved 340 GHz (870 mu m) continuum emission from 105 nearby protoplanetary disks. Building on the previous SMA survey, we infer surface brightness profiles using a simple model of the observed visibilities to derive the luminosities (L-mm) and effective sizes (R-eff) of the continuum emission. With this sample, we confirm the shapes, normalizations, and dispersions for the strong correlations between L-mm, M-* (or L-*), and M-* found in previous studies. We also verify the continuum size-luminosity relation determined from the SMA survey alone (extending to an order of magnitude lower L-mm), demonstrating that the amount of emission scales linearly with the emitting surface area. Moreover, we identify new, although weaker, relationships between R-eff and the host and accretion properties, such that disks are larger around more massive hosts with higher accretion rates. We explore these interrelated demographic properties with some highly simplified approximations. These multi-dimensional relationships can be explained if the emission is optically thick with a filling factor of similar to 0.3, or if the emission is optically thin and disks have roughly the same optical depth profile shapes and normalizations independent of host properties. In both scenarios, we require the dust disk sizes to have a slightly sublinear relationship with the host mass and a non-negligible dispersion (similar to 0.2 dex at a given M-*).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据