4.8 Article

First turnover analysis of water-oxidation catalyzed by Co-oxide nanoparticles

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 2492-2503

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ee00700c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Strong Research Environment Solar Fuels (Umea University)
  2. Artificial Leaf Project Umea (Knut & Alice Wallenberg foundation)
  3. Energimyndigheten
  4. Swedish Energy Agency
  5. Knut & Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  6. COST Action [CM1205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Co-oxides are promising water oxidation catalysts for artificial photosynthesis devices. Presently, several different proposals exist for how they catalyze O-2 formation from water. Knowledge about this process at molecular detail will be required for their further improvement. Here we present time-resolved O-18-labelling isotope-ratio membrane-inlet mass spectrometry (MIMS) experiments to study the mechanism of water oxidation in Co/methylenediphosphonate (Co/M2P) oxide nanoparticles using [Ru(bpy)(3)](3+) (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine) as chemical oxidant. We show that O-16-Co/M2P-oxide nanoparticles produce O-16(2) during their first turnover after simultaneous addition of (H2O)-O-18 and [Ru(bpy)(3)](3+), while sequential addition with a delay of 3 s yields oxygen reflecting bulk water O-18-enrichment. This result is interpreted to show that the O-O bond formation in Co/M2P-oxide nanoparticles occurs via intramolecular oxygen coupling between two terminal Co-OHn ligands that are readily exchangeable with bulk water in the resting state of the catalyst. Importantly, our data allow the determination of the number of catalytic sites within this amorphous nanoparticular material, to calculate the TOF per catalytic site and to derive the number of holes needed for the production of the first O-2 molecule per catalytic site. We propose that the mechanism of O-O bond formation during bulk catalysis in amorphous Co-oxides may differ from that taking place at the surface of crystalline materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据