3.8 Article

Multivariate dynamics of one-mode and two-mode networks: Explaining similarity in sports participation among friends

期刊

NETWORK SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 370-395

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/nws.2018.11

关键词

peer influence; friendship networks; social context; stochastic actor-oriented network dynamic model; sports; extracurricular activity participation; two-mode homophily

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01MH100021, R01DA039934]
  2. [RC1AA019239]
  3. [R01CA157155]
  4. [R00AA019699]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined social mechanisms that account for similarity in the social context of school-sponsored extracurricular sports activities among friends. We distinguish two social mechanisms: shared sports activities that lead to friendship, whereby friendship formation and maintenance are conditioned by joint sports participation, and friendship that leads to shared sports activities, a form of social influence whereby adolescents join or maintain certain sports activities based on their friends' choices. Using a longitudinal sample of 1,776 10th graders at five high schools in Southern California, we employed a stochastic actor-oriented multivariate dynamic model to model the dynamic interplay between the two-mode affiliation network of adolescents' participation in sports activities and the one-mode friendship network. As a corresponding descriptive method, we propose a quantitative measure for the relative strength of the two-mentioned mechanisms as explanations of the association between the one-mode and the two-mode network. Further, we introduce two specifications that represent homophily effects in the two-mode network and apply them to test gender homophily in sports participation. The results provide strong evidence for both mechanisms, with friendship leading to shared sport activities as stronger than shared sports activities leading to friendships in explaining adolescents' friendships with co-participants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据