3.8 Proceedings Paper

Determination of Soil Moisture Content using Laboratory Experimental and Field Electrical Resistivity Values

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/995/1/012074

关键词

-

资金

  1. Incentive Grant Scheme for Publication (IGSP) [U258]
  2. Ministry of Higher Education under Research and Innovation Fund
  3. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia under Research and Innovation Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficiency of civil engineering structure require comprehensive geotechnical data obtained from site investigation. In the past, conventional site investigation was heavily related to drilling techniques thus suffer from several limitations such as time consuming, expensive and limited data collection. Consequently, this study presents determination of soil moisture content using laboratory experimental and field electrical resistivity values (ERV). Field and laboratory electrical resistivity (ER) test were performed using ABEM SAS4000 and Nilsson400 soil resistance meter. Soil sample used for resistivity test was tested for characterization test specifically on particle size distribution and moisture content test according to BS1377 (1990). Field ER data was processed using RES2DINV software while laboratory ER data was analyzed using SPSS and Excel software. Correlation of ERV and moisture content shows some medium relationship due to its r = 0.506. Moreover, coefficient of determination, R-2 analyzed has demonstrate that the statistical correlation obtain was very good due to its R-2 value of 0.9382. In order to determine soil moisture content based on statistical correlation (w = 110.68 rho(-0.347)), correction factor, C was established through laboratory and field ERV given as 19.27. Finally, this study has shown that soil basic geotechnical properties with particular reference to water content was applicably determined using integration of laboratory and field ERV data analysis thus able to compliment conventional approach due to its economic, fast and wider data coverage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据