4.7 Article

Volcanism, mineralization and metamorphism at the Xitieshan Pb-Zn deposit, NW China: Insights from zircon geochronology and geochemistry

期刊

ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 289-303

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.05.010

关键词

Zircon geochemistry; Metamorphic fluid; VSHMS; Xietieshan; Tanjianshan,North Qadaim

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41172087, 41502067, 41672074]
  2. West Mining Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The footwall volcanic rocks of the Ordovician Tanjianshan Group in the world-class Xitieshan Pb-Zn deposit have experienced prolonged arc volcanism followed by strong metamorphism and deformation. This has resulted in a complex thermal history and led to ambiguity in interpretation of zircon geochronological results. An integrated study involving textural characterization, CL imaging, trace element analysis, Ti-in-zircon thermometry and LA-ICPMS U-Pb dating has provided tight constraints on the age and genesis of the zircon groups in the volcanic rocks. The temperature of metamorphism and deformation indicated by metacryst minerals and micro-structures in the volcanic rocks ranges from 550 to 650 degrees C, which partially overlaps with the lower temperature range of zircon crystallization (600-750 degrees C) calculated using the Ti-in-zircon thermometer. Cathodoluminescence images and trace element compositions confirm a magmatic origin for the zircons, which have also been variably altered by metamorphic fluids. Two ranges of U-Pb ages, 475-470 Ma and 460-450 Ma, have been obtained on typical magmatic zircons and are interpreted to represent pre-mineralization arc volcanism in the Xitieshan deposit. A younger age group of 440-430 Ma for the fluid-modified zircons is considered to record post ore metamorphism during the North Qadaim Orogeny. Thus, we propose that the original exhalative ores at the Xitieshan Pb-Zn deposit formed at 450-440 Ma. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据