4.6 Article

Psychometric validation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in Head and Neck Cancer patients

期刊

ORAL ONCOLOGY
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 158-162

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.11.010

关键词

Head and neck cancer; Depression; CES-D; Psychometric validation; Exploratory factor analysis; Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale; Oral cancer

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R25 CA112383] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item tool developed to screen for depression in the general population. To psychometrically evaluate and validate the CES-D scale for use in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Methods: The CES-D was applied to 130 subjects at onset of radiation treatment and 3-months following treatment. Analysis was conducted via face and content validity using two expert raters, internal consistency was applied using Cronbach's alpha, test retest reliability comparing baseline to 3-month application, concurrent validity was performed against the FACT-H&N and Pain Disability Index, construct validity was conducted via exploratory factor analysis. Results: The sample was predominantly male receiving chemo radiation. Face validity was strong (alpha = 0.85). Significant difference was found in the mean score between depressed (CES-D cut point=16) vs. non-depressed (t= -15.84, p =. 00) (95% CI = -17.18, - 13.33). Internal consistency of the scale was high (alpha= 0.84). Test retest reliability (p <.001) showed moderate-strong correlations (0.51), however was not sensitive to change in this sample across the study time period. Concurrent validity was strong (r=-0.77, 0.51). Factor analysis at baseline explained 54.92% of variance, with 3 distinct factors; depressed affect, somatic/retarded activity, and positive affect. In contrast to general populations, the factor 'disturbed interpersonal skill' was not retained. Conclusion: Results confirm the reliability and validity of the CES-D as a measure of depression in HNC populations. Proposed cut off scores remain stable but scale responsiveness suggests caution when evaluating change over time in this population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据