4.5 Article

Effect of magnetic field on laser induced breakdown spectroscopy of zirconium dioxide (ZrO2) plasma

期刊

OPTIK
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 536-544

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.04.046

关键词

Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy; Magnetic field confinement; Emission intensity; Electron temperature; Electron density; ZrO2 plume

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy of ZrO2 plasma in the presence and absence of magnetic field has been investigated. The plasma was generated by employing Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm, 10 ns) at various fluences ranging from 6.4J cm(-2) to 25.6J cm(-2) under argon environment of pressure of 100 Torr. Both emission intensity and electron temperature show increasing trend with increasing the fluence, whereas, electron number density of ZrO2 plasma decreases with increasing the laser fluence. It is revealed that values of emission intensity, electron temperature and electron number density of ZrO2 plasma are slightly higher in the presence of magnetic field as compared to field free case at all fluences. This increase in plasma parameters is attributed to magnetic confinement and Joule heating effect. With the variation of fluence the electron temperature of ZrO2 plasma varies slightly from 5345 K to 5475 K in the absence of magnetic field, whereas in case of magnetic field this value enhances from 5435 K to 5600 K. Similarly the electron number density of ZrO2 plasma varies from 1.80 x 10(18) cm(-3) to 3.50 x 10(18) cm(-3) in the absence of magnetic field, whereas in case of magnetic field, the variation in electron number density varies from 1.75 x 10(18) cm(-3) to 4.25 x 10(18) cm(-3). The existence of magnetic confinement effects is confirmed by the analytical evaluation of plasma parameter beta, which is smaller than 1 under all experimental conditions. It is also revealed that both the laser fluence as well as magnetic field significantly influence the ZrO2 plasma parameters. (C) 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据