4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on thermophysical properties of capric acid-lauric acid phase change slurries for thermal storage system

期刊

ENERGY
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 359-368

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.129

关键词

Fatty acids; Phase change slurries; Rheological behavior; Supercooling; Thermophysical properties; Stability

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51378426]
  2. Sichuan Province Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team of Building Environment and Energy Efficiency [2015TD0015]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [2682015CX038]
  4. Cultivation program for the Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of Southwest Jiaotong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Possessing the fluxility of transfer fluids and the latent heat capacity of PCMs (phase change materials), fatty acids PCSs (phase change slurries) can be utilized as a superior alternative to store thermal energy collected from many fields. CA (Capric acid)-LA (lauric acid) PCSs, with span20/SDS used as emulsifiers in the mass ratio of 3.24:1, are prepared for the first time in this paper. The optimized parameters, including the concentration of fatty acids, shearing rate and shearing time, are investigated during the preparation based on the criteria of the average droplet size. The morphology, rheological behavior of obtained PCSs are also further elaborated, as well as thermophysical properties. The results indicate that obtained PCSs in the form of milky liquid occupy the average droplet size of 1 mu m. Supercooling is alleviated from 20 degrees C to 10 degrees C by the introduction to hexadecanol. And the latent heat of PCSs with 30 wt % and 50 wt% fatty acids is 43.36 and 74.43 J/g, respectively. Additionally, fatty acids PCSs show excellent stability in the point view of the droplet size, viscosity and thermophysical properties under the conditions of storage and 100 freezing/melting cycles. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据