4.6 Article

Varied antibody reactivities and clinical relevance in anti-GQ1b antibody-related diseases

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000501

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [15H04845, 18H02745]
  2. Practical Research Project for Rare/Intractable Diseases from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [16ek0109056h0003]
  3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  4. NCNP [28-5]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H04845, 18H02745] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To investigate the relationship between antibody reactivities against glycolipid complexes and clinical features in Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS), Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis (BBE), and Guillain-Barre syndrome with ophthalmoplegia (GBS-OP). Methods Using glycoarray, antibodies against 10 glycolipid antigens (GM1, GM2, GM4, GD1a, GD1b, GQ1b, galactocerebroside, lactosylceramide, GA1, and sulfatide) and 45 glycolipid complexes consisting 2 of the glycolipids were examined in the sera of 63 patients with GBS-OP, 37 patients with MFS, and 27 patients with BBE. Results Antibodies to antigens containing GQ1b were identified in 73% of patients with GBS-OP (46/63), 86.5% of patients with MFS (32/37), and 74.1% of patients with BBE (20/27), and GD1b-related antibodies were identified in 49.2% of patients with GBS-OP (31/63), 29.7% of patients with MFS (11/37), and 11.1% of patients with BBE (3/27). Comparing clinical features between patients with GBS-OP with and without both antibodies, the proportion of patients requiring artificial ventilation and presenting moderate or severe muscle weakness was higher in the positive group than in the negative group (p = 0.017 and p = 0.046, respectively). Conclusions Antibodies binding to antigens containing GD1b and to those containing GQ1b may be involved in the development of limb weakness and respiratory failure in anti-GQ1b antibody-related diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据