3.8 Review

Rethinking Bone Disease in Kidney Disease

期刊

JBMR PLUS
卷 2, 期 6, 页码 309-322

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10117

关键词

CKD; ESKD; CKD-MBD; FRACTURES; OSTEOPOROSIS; BONE DISEASE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Renal osteodystrophy (ROD) is thebonecomponent of chronic kidney disease mineral andbone disorder (CKD-MBD). ROD affects bone quality and strength through the numerous hormonal and metabolic disturbances that occur in patients with kidney disease. Collectively these disorders in bone quality increase fracture risk in CKDpatients compared with the general population. Fractures are a serious complication of kidney disease and are associated with highermorbidity andmortality compared with the general population. Furthermore, at a population level, fractures are at historically high levels in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), whereas in contrast the general population has experienced a steady decline in fracture incidence rates. Based on these findings, it is clear that a paradigm shift is needed in our approach to diagnosing andmanagingROD. In clinical practice, our ability to diagnoseRODand initiate antifracture treatments is impeded by the lack of accurate noninvasive methods that identify ROD type. The past decade has seen advances in the noninvasive measurement of bone quality and strength that have been studied in kidney disease patients. Below we review the current literature pertaining to the epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, and management of ROD. We aim to highlight the pressing need for a greater awareness of this condition and the need for the implementation of strategies that prevent fractures in kidney disease patients. Research is needed for more accurate noninvasive assessment of ROD type, clinical studies of existing osteoporosis therapies in patients across the spectrumof kidney disease, and the development of CKD-specific treatments. (C) 2018 The Authors JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据