4.7 Article

Methanol-gasoline Dual-fuel Spark Ignition (DFSI) combustion with dual-injection for engine particle number (PN) reduction and fuel economy improvement

期刊

ENERGY
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 1010-1017

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.051

关键词

Methanol-gasoline combustion; Dual-fuel spark ignition; PIDI (Port fuel injection and direct injection); Particle number; Size spectrum

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental research on the key scientific problems in gasoline direct injection engines [51036004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To meet the near future emissions legislations of SI (spark ignition) internal combustion engines, this paper presents an experimental study on the M-G DFSI (Methanol-Gasoline Dual-fuel Spark Ignition) combustion for reducing PN (particle number) emissions and improving fuel economy in a high compression ratio gasoline engine. M-G DFSI was operated using port-injection of a highly oxygenated, high latent heat and high octane number fuel to reduce PN emissions and improve fuel economy, direct injection of a high energy density and high volatility fuel to obtain fast load response and high load. The effects of the ratio of methanol to gasoline during DFSI at stoichiometric conditions on PN reduction and fuel economy improvement were investigated. As the proportion of PFI-Methanol increases, the absolute and relative BSFCequivalent improvement in terms of fuel economy will be extended almost linearly. Also, both the nucleation mode and accumulation mode of PN emissions drops dramatically. Furthermore, there is an optimal PFI-methanol mass fraction value to get sufficient fuel economy improvement and PN emissions reduction while reaching the peak performance. It can be shown that Methanol-Gasoline DFSI is a potential combustion strategy to reduce PN emissions effectively and significantly improve fuel economy in practical applications of gasoline engines. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据