4.7 Article

MgO-Therminol 55 nanofluids for efficient energy management: Analysis of transient heat transfer performance

期刊

ENERGY
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 408-416

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.061

关键词

Magnesium oxide; Therminol 55; Energy management; Nanofluid; Overall heat transfer coefficient; Transient heat transfer

资金

  1. Nano Mission Council, Department of Science & Technology (DST), India [SR/NM/ PG-16/2007]
  2. DST, India [SR/FT/ET-061/2008]
  3. Research & Modernization Project, SASTRA University, India [1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

'Therminol 55' is one of the heat transfer fluids used in process industries and possesses low freezing and high boiling points. The thermal conductivity of Therminol 55 can be improved through dispersion of nanoparticles leading to nanofluids. Magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles (25-45 nm) were synthesized from magnesium nitrate by reaction with ammonium carbonate at 80 degrees C, followed by calcination at 800 degrees C for 1 h. MgO-Therminol 55 nanofluid was prepared by dispersing MgO nanoparticles in Therminol 55 using oleic acid as dispersant, followed by bath ultrasonication. Thermal conductivity ratio of nanofluids was found to vary linearly with nanoparticle volume fraction, while exhibiting biphasic trend with respect to the influence of temperature. Liquid layering and micro-convection caused by Brownian motion were found to be dominant contributors of thermal conductivity enhancement at lower (10 -30 degrees C) and higher (70-120 degrees C) temperatures respectively. Our data reveal linear increase in overall heat transfer coefficient with nanoparticle volume fraction under constant bath temperature condition, closely matching the thermal conductivity - nanoparticle volume fraction relationship. This is the first work on preparation, characterization and heat transfer performance of MgO-Therminol 55 nanofluids, highlighting its value for energy management. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据