4.5 Article

Development of Children's Sensitivity to Overinformativeness in Learning and Teaching

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 54, 期 11, 页码 2113-2125

出版社

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/dev0000580

关键词

social learning; theory of mind; communication; pragmatics; common ground

资金

  1. Varieties of Understanding Project at Fordham University
  2. John Templeton Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DRL-1149116]
  4. Center for Brains, Minds, and Machines - NSF STC [CCF-1231216]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effective communication requires knowing the right amount of information to provide; what is necessary for a naive learner to arrive at a target hypothesis may be superfluous and inefficient for a knowledgeable learner. The current study examines 4- to 7-year-olds' developing sensitivity to overinformative communication and their ability to decide how much information is appropriate depending on the learner's prior knowledge. In Experiment 1 (N = 184, age = 4.09-7.98 years), 5- to 7-year-old children preferred teachers who gave costly, exhaustive demonstrations when learners were naive, but preferred teachers who gave efficient, selective demonstrations when learners were already knowledgeable given their prior experience (i.e., common ground). However, 4-year-olds did not show a clear preference. In Experiment 2 (N = 80, age = 4.05-6.99 years), we asked whether children flexibly modulated their own teaching based on learners' knowledge. Five and 6-year-olds, but not 4-year-olds, were more likely to provide exhaustive demonstrations to naive learners than to knowledgeable learners. These results suggest that by 5 years of age, children are sensitive to overinformativeness and understand the trade-off between informativeness and efficiency; they reason about what others know based on the presence or absence of common ground and flexibly decide how much information is appropriate both as learners and as teachers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据