4.7 Article

Ecophysiological characteristics of red, green, and brown strains of the Baltic picocyanobacterium Synechococcus sp - a laboratory study

期刊

BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 15, 期 20, 页码 6257-6276

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-15-6257-2018

关键词

-

资金

  1. BMN, Poland [538-G245-B116-18]
  2. Polish National Science Centre project [2012/07/N/ST10/03485]
  3. Polish National Science Centre [2016/20/T/ST10/00214]
  4. IO PAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The contribution of picocyanobacteria (PCY) to summer phytoplankton blooms, accompanied by an ecological crisis is a new phenomenon in Europe. This issue requires careful investigation. The present study examined the response of Synechococcus sp. physiology to different environmental conditions. Three strains of Synechococcus sp. (red BA-120, green BA-124, and brown BA-132) were cultivated in a laboratory under previously determined environmental conditions. These conditions were as follows: temperature (T) from 10 by 5 to 25 degrees C, salinity from 3 by 5 to 18 PSU, and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) from 10 by 90 to 280 mu mol photons m(-2) s(-1), which gave 64 combinations of synthetic, though realistic, environmental scenarios. Scenarios reflecting all possible combinations were applied in the laboratory experiments. Results pointed to differences in final numbers of cells among strains. However, there was also a similar tendency for BA-124 and BA-132, which demonstrated the highest concentrations of PCY cells at elevated T and PAR. This was also the case for BA-120 but only to a certain degree as the number of cells started to decrease above 190 mu mol photons m(-2) s(-1) PAR. Pigmentation, chlorophyll a (Chl a), fluorescence, and rate of photosynthesis presented both similarities and differences among strains. In this context, more consistent features were observed between brown and red strains when compared to the green. In this paper, the ecophysiological responses of PCY are defined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据