4.7 Article

Renewable build-up pathways for the US: Generation costs are not system costs

期刊

ENERGY
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 437-445

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.056

关键词

Energy system design; Large-scale integration of renewable power generation; Renewable power generation; Optimal mix of wind and solar PV; Levelized cost of electricity

资金

  1. O. and H. Stocker
  2. M. and H. Puschmann
  3. National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) fellowship
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) graduate fellowship
  5. Stanford University Charles H. Leavell Graduate Student Fellowship
  6. DONG Energy
  7. Danish Advanced Technology Foundation
  8. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [03SF0472C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transition to a future electricity system based primarily on wind and solar PV is examined for all regions in the contiguous US. We present optimized pathways for the build-up of wind and solar power for least backup energy needs as well as for least cost obtained with a simplified, lightweight model based on long-term high resolution weather-determined generation data. In the absence of storage, the pathway which achieves the best match of generation and load, thus resulting in the least backup energy requirements, generally favors a combination of both technologies, with a wind/solar PV (photovoltaics) energy mix of about 80/20 in a fully renewable scenario. The least cost development is seen to start with 100% of the technology with the lowest average generation costs first, but with increasing renewable installations, economically unfavorable excess generation pushes it toward the minimal backup pathway. Surplus generation and the entailed costs can be reduced significantly by combining wind and solar power, and/or absorbing excess generation, for example with storage or transmission, or by coupling the electricity system to other energy sectors. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据