4.6 Article

Adsorption of ng L-1-level arsenic by ZIF-8 nanoparticles: application to the monitoring of environmental water

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 8, 期 63, 页码 36360-36368

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra07776b

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The provisional contamination level of arsenic in drinking water is 10 g L-1. For decreasing this value to a safer level, a more precise method for analyzing dissolved arsenic is required. With this aim, we synthesized zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) in the aqueous phase and characterized its potential application for monitoring the trace arsenic in fresh water. In this regard, we report following three notable outcomes. First, we demonstrate the excellent performance of ZIF-8 nanoparticles (nZIF-8) for the adsorption of ng L-1 levels of AsO43-. nZIF-8 is able to adsorb over 99% of arsenic from as low as 10 ng L-1 AsO43- solutions. This performance was maintained even in the presence of commonly coexisting anions, for example, >90% adsorption from a 0.1 g L-1 arsenic solution was observed in the presence of 10 mg L-1 of Cl-, NO3-, CO32-, or SO42-, or 1 mg L-1 of PO43-. Second, we clarified that the mechanism of arsenic adsorption by ZIF-8 is simply a ligand exchange process, in which the As(v) oxide anion replaces the imidazolate unit in the framework. Third, we propose a handy scheme for the analysis of ng L-1 levels of arsenic in drinking water, in which nZIF-8 is used for the concentration of trace level AsO43-. By doing this, as low as 100 ng L-1 arsenate in drinking water can be quantified by colorimetric analysis, the detection limit of which is 5 g L-1 in pure water. The application of this scheme is expected to highly enhance AsO43- detection first by concentrating it to an easily detectable range, and second by excluding the majority of interfering ions present in the system. Therefore, a reduction in the minimum quantifying limit of arsenic in fresh water to as low as 1 ng L-1 can be expected if the method is coupled with ICP-MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据