4.6 Article

Geological and geo-structural characterization of the Montemurro area (Southern Italy) inferred from audiomagnetotelluric survey

期刊

GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 1156-1171

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2018.1502210

关键词

Audio-magnetotelluric; landslides; Southern Apennine; Eastern Agri Fault System (EAFS); electrical resistivity model

资金

  1. Eni S.p.A.
  2. Development and Cohesion Fund - APQ Research Puglia Region 'Regional Program to support smart specialization and social and environmental sustainability -FutureInResearch'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the results obtained by an audio-magnetotelluric (AMT) survey carried out crossing the western sector of Montemurro village (Southern Italy) affected by an intense hydrogeological instability. The AMT investigation was aimed to settle the question concerning the possible prosecution toward SE of the Eastern Agri Fault System whose surficial evidences could be blinded by extensive landslides phenomena and by anthropization of the territory. The AMT profile was oriented in NE-SW direction, orthogonal to the main geological structures of the investigated area. It crossed longitudinally the area affected by instability. The AMT model provides new insights on already known faults (i.e. Montemurro Faults) and imaged their in-depth immersion thus answering to still open geological question in the investigated areas. Furthermore, the high resolution of the model allowed the imaging of the boundaries, in terms of resistivity contrast, between material affected/unaffected by the sliding dynamics or characterized by an higher water content. The results provide new knowledge about the geological and geoelectrical structures in the area. They will be fully integrated with the results of the on-going research activities in the area and will represent an additional step for the multiscale and multiparametrical characterization of the Agri Valley geological setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据