4.1 Article

Concerns of Anophthalmic Patients Wearing Cryolite Glass Prosthetic Eyes

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001021

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [FOR2240, HE 6743/2-1, HE 6743/3-1]
  2. GEROK-Program University Hospital of Cologne

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To identify the main concerns of patients experienced in wearing cryolite glass prosthetic eyes and to investigate how these have changed over time. Methods: One hundred six patients experienced in wearing prosthetic eyes for at least 2 years were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire regarding prosthetic eye concerns at the time of initial eye loss and at the present time. Main outcome measures included changes in levels of concern over time. Results: Initially, the participants were mainly concerned about their appearance, health of the fellow eye, and coping with monocularity. Over time, there was a significant increase of the level of concern regarding the health of the remaining eye (p < 0.001) and regarding watering, crusting, and discharge (p < 0.001). Loss of balance did not change significantly (p = 0.302). All other concerns decreased significantly over time (p < 0.001), with levels of concern about appearance decreasing the most. The current leading concern was the health of the remaining eye followed by concerns about watering, crusting, and discharge. Length of time since natural eye loss was the most important explanatory variable, with significant impact on the concerns about appearance (p = 0.013), retention of the prosthetic eye (p = 0.002), and eyelid contour (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Health of the remaining eye is the most common current concern of anophthalmic patients, acknowledging the need of good ophthalmologic follow up after losing an eye. The second most important concern is with watering, crusting, and discharge, suggesting further research for establishing an evidence-based protocol for cryolite glass prosthetic eye maintenance and supportive treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据