4.0 Article

The fragility of an independent judiciary: Lessons from Hungary and Poland-and the European Union

期刊

COMMUNIST AND POST-COMMUNIST STUDIES
卷 51, 期 3, 页码 189-200

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.07.005

关键词

Comparative constitutional law; Judicial independence; Hungary; Poland; European Union; Democratic decline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When the European Union was founded, it was assumed that all Member States admitted as consolidated democracies would maintain their constitutional commitments. In recent years, Hungary and Poland have challenged this premise as elected autocratic governments in those countries have captured independent institutions and threatened longterm democracy. The judiciaries of these countries have been hard hit. In this paper, we trace what has happened to the judiciaries in Hungary and Poland, showing how first the constitutional courts and then the ordinary judiciary have been brought under the control of political forces so that there is no longer a separation of law and politics. We also explore why the European Union has so far not been able to stop this process. In the end, the European judiciary, particularly the Court of Justice, is attempting a rescue of national judiciaries, but the results are so far unclear. (C) 2018 The Regents of the University of California. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据