4.4 Article

G-Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor Antagonist G15 Decreases Estrogen-Induced Development of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

期刊

ONCOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 283-292

出版社

COGNIZANT COMMUNICATION CORP
DOI: 10.3727/096504017X15035795904677

关键词

G15; G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER); Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); G1; E2

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81272590, 81402163]
  2. Wuhan Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau [2011415]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) was found to promote non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by estrogen, indicating the potential necessity of inhibiting GPER by a selective antagonist. This study was performed to elucidate the function of GPER-selective inhibitor G15 in NSCLC development. Cytoplasmic GPER (cGPER) and nuclear GPER (nGPER) were detected by immunohistochemical analysis in NSCLC samples. The relation of GPER and estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) expression and correlation between GPER, ER beta, and clinical factors were analyzed. The effects of activating GPER and function of G15 were analyzed in the proliferation of A549 and H1793 cell lines and development of urethane-induced adenocarcinoma. Overexpression of cGPER and nGPER was detected in 80.49% (120/150) and 52.00% (78/150) of the NSCLC samples. High expression of GPER was related with higher stages, poorer differentiation, and high expression of ER beta. The protein level of GPER in the A549 and H1793 cell lines was increased by treatment with E2, G1 (GPER agonist), or fulvestrant (Ful; ER beta antagonist) and decreased by G15. Administration with G15 reversed the E2- or G1-induced cell growth by inhibiting GPER. In urethane-induced adenocarcinoma mice, the number of tumor nodules and tumor index increased in the E2 or G1 group and decreased by treatment with G15. These findings demonstrate that using G15 to block GPER signaling may be considered as a new therapeutic target in NSCLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据