4.2 Article

Injectable Hybrid Hydrogels, with Cell-Responsive Degradation, for Tumor Resection

期刊

ACS APPLIED BIO MATERIALS
卷 1, 期 5, 页码 1301-1310

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.8b00189

关键词

injectable hydrogels; breakable nanocapsules; polyamidoamines; endoscopic submucosal dissection; tumor resection

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [2009-247365]
  2. European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovative programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [642192]
  3. ERC Starting Grant MITOCHON [ERC-StG-2013-338133]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy MINECO [FIS2015-70339-C2-1-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biocompatible soft materials have recently found applications in interventional endoscopy to facilitate resection of mucosal tumors. When neoplastic lesions are in organs that can be easily damaged by perforation, such as stomach, intestine, and esophagus, the formation of a submucosal fluid cushion (SFC) is needed to lift the tumor from the underlying muscle during the resection of neoplasias. Such procedure is called endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We describe an injectable, biodegradable, hybrid hydrogel able to form a SFC and to facilitate ESD. The hydrogel, based on polyamidoamines, contains breakable silica nanocapsules covalently bound to its network and able to release biomolecules. To promote degradation, the hydrogel is composed of cleavable disulfide moieties that are reduced by the cells through secretion of glutathione. The same stimulus triggers the breaking of the silica nanocapsules; therefore, the entire hybrid material can be completely degraded and its decomposition depends entirely on the presence of cells. Interestingly, the hydrogel precursor solution showed rapid gelation when injected in vivo and afforded a long-lasting high mucosal elevation, keeping the cushion volume constant during the dissection. This novel material can provide a solution to ESD limitations and promote healing of tissues after surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据