4.5 Article

The differential regulation of microRNAs is associated with oral cancer

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 1613-1620

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.5811

关键词

microRNA; miR-375; miR-204; miR-196a; oral cancer patients

类别

资金

  1. China Medical University [CMU95-305]
  2. National Science Council [NSC 98-2815-C-039-016-B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), is the most frequently occurring malignant head and neck tumor, generally it exhibits a poor prognosis, and metastasis is the main cause of death in these cancer patients. The discovery of reliable prognostic indicators for tumors progression would greatly improve clinical treatments. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a critical role in the degradation of mRNA and the inhibition of protein synthesis. The miRNAs function either as tumor suppressors or as oncogenes in tumorigenesis, and little is known about the clinical significance of miRNA expression profiles in oral cancers. In the present study, we investigated the expression profiles of miR-375, miR-204 and miR-196a in 39 healthy and tumor tissue pairs of oral cancer patients using TaqMan real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The predicted target genes for miR-375, miR-204 and miR-196a were confirmed using luciferase reporter-based assays and western blot analyses. In oral cancer tissue, the expression of miR-375 and miR-204 decreased, whereas the expression of miR-196a was significantly elevated. In OSCC, HOXB8 and p27 (CDKN1B) were the direct target genes of miR-196a, whereas HMGA2 was the direct target gene of miR-204. HOXB8 and p27 (CDKN1B) protein expression levels were inhibited by miR-196a, whereas the protein expression level of HMGA2 was inhibited by miR-204. Furthermore, the miR-196a inhibitor blocked cell proliferation. Our results indicate that the combined expression signatures of miR-375, miR-204 and miR-196a are promising biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of OSCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据