4.7 Article

Tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum(III)-Cored Molecular Cathode Interlayer: Improving Electron Mobility and Photovoltaic Efficiency of Polymer Solar Cells

期刊

SOLAR RRL
卷 2, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/solr.201800182

关键词

cathode interlayers; film thickness insensitivity; fullerene polymer solar cells; non-fullerene polymer solar cells; tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum(III)

资金

  1. NSFC [51573107, 91633301, 21432005]
  2. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering [sklpme2017-2-04]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012017yjsy109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum(III) (Alq(3))-cored small molecular electrolytes, Alq(3)-F1, Alq(3)-F2, and Alq(3)-F3, armed with ammonium functionalized fluorene units have been successfully designed and synthesized as efficient cathode interlayers (CILs) for high-performance fullerene and non-fullerene polymer solar cells (F-PSCs and NF-PSCs). The repeating number effect of the polar group-grafted fluorene arms is also investigated in detail on the cathode interfacial modification and the final photovoltaic performance. Increasing the amount of ammonium functionalized fluorene units will efficiently improve the interfacial dipole moment and result in lowering the work function (W-F) of the Al cathode. On the other hand, the proportion of Alq(3) segment will decrease with increasing the repeating number of the polar group-grafted fluorene arms, which deduce the electron mobility of the target molecules. Alq(3)-F2 shows a good balance between the above two factors, whose devices exhibit the highest power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of 10.15% in F-PSCs and 13.75% in NF-PSCs. Importantly, these CIL molecules have the excellent thickness-insensitive property enabled by the high electron mobility of the Alq(3) core. The PCEs of the PSCs incorporating the Alq(3)-containing CILs can retain about 70-80% even with a large thickness up to 50 nm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据