4.7 Article

Characterisation of current and turbulence in the FloWave Ocean Energy Research Facility

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 103-115

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.02.028

关键词

Renewable energy; Tidal energy; Physical testing; Turbulence; Acoustic sensors; Wave-current basin

资金

  1. Nortek UK
  2. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
  3. Energy Technologies Institute
  4. UK EPSRC [EP/I02932X/1]
  5. RCUK Energy programme [EP/J500847/1]
  6. EPSRC [EP/I02932X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1421236, EP/I02932X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tidal energy is a developing industry and requires high precision test facilities which replicate the full-scale flows as accurately as possible to develop new technologies. In particular, the spatial and temporal variation must be well understood. FloWave is a state-of-the-art test facility with the ability to produce multi-directional waves and currents. This work investigates the mean and turbulent flow parameters throughout the tank using an ADV. The goal is to provide a comprehensive characterisation of the flow in the tank, in a robust and repeatable manner. These flow parameters are then compared to sample data from field measurements for context. The turbulence intensities are normally distributed in the range of 5-11% and integral lengthscales were log normally distributed over a 0.18-0.41 m range across the test area. The Reynolds stresses showed the streamwise-vertical pair were relatively constant throughout the depth, with values in the range 0.31 to 0.15 Pa, while the transverse-vertical pair show high vertical variation with values of -1.35 to 0.20 Pa. For the majority of locations the flow metrics are generally realistic compared with those measured at the Fall of Warness site. This work improves the understanding of flow behaviour in the tank, facilitating higher confidence testing of scaled devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据