4.3 Article

Numerical modeling of space-time wave extremes using WAVEWATCH III

期刊

OCEAN DYNAMICS
卷 67, 期 3-4, 页码 535-549

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10236-016-1025-0

关键词

Space-time wave extremes; WAVEWATCH III; Ocean waves; Stereo vision; Numerical modeling

资金

  1. NCEP/NOAA
  2. Flagship Project RITMARE-The Italian Research for the Sea
  3. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research within the National Research Program
  4. Italian National Research Council (CNR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel implementation of parameters estimating the space-time wave extremes within the spectral wave modelWAVEWATCH III (WW3) is presented. The new output parameters, available in WW3 version 5.16, rely on the theoretical model of Fedele (J Phys Oceanogr 42( 9): 1601-1615, 2012) extended by Benetazzo et al. (J Phys Oceanogr 45( 9): 2261-2275, 2015) to estimate the maximum secondorder nonlinear crest height over a given space-time region. In order to assess the wave height associated to the maximum crest height and the maximum wave height (generally different in a broad-band stormy sea state), the linear quasi-determinism theory of Boccotti (2000) is considered. The new WW3 implementation is tested by simulating sea states and space-time extremes over the Mediterranean Sea ( forced by the wind fields produced by the COSMO-ME atmospheric model). Model simulations are compared to space-time wave maxima observed on March 10th, 2014, in the northern Adriatic Sea (Italy), by a stereo camera system installed on-board the Acqua Alta oceanographic tower. Results show that modeled space-time extremes are in general agreement with observations. Differences are mostly ascribed to the accuracy of the wind forcing and, to a lesser extent, to the approximations introduced in the space-time extremes parameterizations. Model estimates are expected to be even more accurate over areas larger than the mean wavelength (for instance, the model grid size).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据