4.6 Article

Collaborative Fusion for Distributed Target Classification Using Evidence Theory in IOT Environment

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 62314-62323

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2876282

关键词

Data fusion; inner reliability; relative reliability; evidential reasoning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61772064]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0840200]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017JBZ107]
  4. Academic Discipline, Post-Graduate Education Project of the Beijing Municipal Commission of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As an efficient strategy, collaborative fusion can promote the classification performance while decreasing data transmission energy consumption and bandwidth requirements. In practice, the appropriate reliability assessment plays an essential rule in the fusion process. In this paper, we mainly concentrate on the classification problem of distributed target in Internet of Things scenarios, and an effective collaborative fusion method in terms of internal reliability and relative reliability evaluation is proposed. The inner reliability reveals the potential classes of the target in accordance with the local hard decision made by distinct sensor. The relative reliability reflects the credibility of the soft decision represented by belief function. These two reliability measures are complementary with each other. In our proposed fusion method, the inner reliability is applied to transfer the local hard decision into rational soft decision, and the relative reliability is utilized to decrease the influence of conflicting soft decisions by making full use of the evidential discounting operation. The discounted soft decisions are related to the combination rule of Dempster-Shafer for the final target classification. Results of experiment show that compared with the traditional fusion method, this method has the better fusion performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据