4.4 Article

In-Hospital Mortality and Post-Surgical Complications Among Cancer Patients with Metabolic Syndrome

期刊

OBESITY SURGERY
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 683-692

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-2900-6

关键词

Metabolic syndrome; Cancer; In-hospital mortality; Inpatient outcomes

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [K01TW010271]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is an important etiologic and prognostic factor for cancer, but few studies have assessed hospitalization outcomes among patients with both conditions. Data was obtained from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS). Study variables were assessed using ICD-9 codes on adults aged 40 years and over admitted to a US hospital between 2007 and 2011 with primary diagnosis of either breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer. We examined in-hospital mortality, post-surgical complications, and discharge disposition among cancer patients with MetS and compared with non-MetS patients. Hospitalized breast (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.20-0.46), colorectal (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.35-0.49), and prostate (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.16-0.49) cancer patients with MetS had significantly reduced odds of in-hospital mortality. The odds of post-surgical complications among breast (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.03-1.39) and prostate (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.09-1.37) cancer patients with MetS were higher, but lower by 7% among colorectal cancer patients with MetS. Additionally, breast (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.11-1.32) and colorectal (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) cancer patients with MetS had significantly higher odds for discharge to a skilled nursing facility compared with those without MetS, but this was not statistically significant among prostate cancer patients. Adverse health outcomes were significantly higher among hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of cancer and MetS. Future studies are needed to identify clinical strategies for detecting and managing patients with MetS to reduce the likelihood of poor inpatient outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据