4.3 Article

Minimizing Maximum (Weighted) Flow-Time on Related and Unrelated Machines

期刊

ALGORITHMICA
卷 77, 期 2, 页码 515-536

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00453-015-0082-y

关键词

Scheduling; Minimizing flow-time; Online algorithms; Competitive analysis

资金

  1. Indo-German Max Planck Center for Computer Science (IMPECS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper we initiate the study of job scheduling on related and unrelated machines so as to minimize the maximum flow time or the maximum weighted flow time (when each job has an associated weight). Previous work for these metrics considered only the setting of parallel machines, while previous work for scheduling on unrelated machines only considered norms. Our main results are: (1) we give an -competitive algorithm to minimize maximum weighted flow time on related machines where we assume that the machines of the online algorithm can process units of a job in 1 time-unit ( speed augmentation). (2) For the objective of minimizing maximum flow time on unrelated machines we give a simple -competitive algorithm when we augment the speed by . For m machines we show a lower bound of on the competitive ratio if speed augmentation is not permitted. Our algorithm does not assign jobs to machines as soon as they arrive. To justify this drawback we show a lower bound of on the competitive ratio of immediate dispatch algorithms. In both these lower bound constructions we use jobs whose processing times are in , and hence they apply to the more restrictive subset parallel setting. (3) For the objective of minimizing maximum weighted flow time on unrelated machines we establish a lower bound of -on the competitive ratio of any online algorithm which is permitted to use speed machines. In our lower bound construction, job j has a processing time of on a subset of machines and infinity on others and has a weight . Hence this lower bound applies to the subset parallel setting for the special case of minimizing maximum stretch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据