4.8 Article

Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome protein TREX1 suppresses L1 and maintains genome integrity through exonuclease-independent ORF1p depletion

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 8, 页码 4619-4631

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx178

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2012CB911100, 2013ZX0001-005]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Education [IRT1016]
  3. Key Laboratory of Molecular Virology, Jilin Province [20102209]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of China [81601363, 81401654]
  5. Norman Bethune Health Science Center of Jilin University, China [yb201302]
  6. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health of the U.S. National Institutes of Health [R21HD083915-01A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maintaining genome integrity is important for cells and damaged DNA triggers autoimmunity. Previous studies have reported that Three-prime repair exonuclease 1(TREX1), an endogenous DNA exonuclease, prevents immune activation by depleting damaged DNA, thus preventing the development of certain autoimmune diseases. Consistently, mutations in TREX1 are linked with autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome (AGS) and familial chilblain lupus. However, TREX1 mutants competent for DNA exonuclease activity are also linked to AGS. Here, we report a nuclease-independent involvement of TREX1 in preventing the L1 retrotransposon-induced DNA damage response. TREX1 interacted with ORF1p and altered its intracellular localization. Furthermore, TREX1 triggered ORF1p depletion and reduced the L1-mediated nicking of genomic DNA. TREX1 mutants related to AGS were deficient in inducing ORF1p depletion and could not prevent L1-mediated DNA damage. Therefore, our findings not only reveal a new mechanism for TREX1-mediated L1 suppression and uncover a new function for TREX1 in protein destabilization, but they also suggest a novel mechanism for TREX1-mediated suppression of innate immune activation through maintaining genome integrity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据