4.8 Article

Rad6-Bre1-mediated H2B ubiquitination regulates telomere replication by promoting telomere-end resection

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 6, 页码 3308-3322

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx101

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [2013CB910403]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 31230040/31461143003/31521061]
  3. China Post-doctoral Science Foundation [2015M571611, 2016T90386]
  4. NSFC [31500658]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rad6 and Bre1, ubiquitin-conjugating E2 and E3 enzymes respectively, are responsible for histone H2B lysine 123 mono-ubiquitination (H2Bub1) in Saccha-romyces cerevisiae. Previous studies have shown that Rad6 and Bre1 regulate telomere length and recombination. However, the underlying molecular mechanism remains largely unknown. Here we report that H2BK123 mutation results in telomere shortening, while inactivation of Ubp8 and/or Ubp10, deubiquitinases of H2Bub1, leads to telomere lengthening in Rad6-Bre1-dependent manner. In telomerase-deficient cells, inactivation of Rad6-Bre1 pathway retards telomere shortening rate and the onset of senescence, while deletion of UBP8 and/or UBP10 accelerates senescence. Thus, Rad6-Bre1 pathway regulates both telomere length and recombination through its role in H2Bub1. Additionally, inactivation of both Rad6-Bre1-H2Bub1 and Mre11-Rad50Xrs2 (MRX) pathways causes synthetic growth defects and telomere shortening in telomeraseproficient cells, and significantly accelerates senescence and eliminates type II telomere recombination in telomerase-deficient cells. Furthermore, RAD6 or BRE1 deletion, or H2BK123Rmutation decreases the accumulation of ssDNA at telomere ends. These results support the model that Rad6-Bre1-H2Bub1 cooperates with MRX to promote telomere-end resection and thus positively regulates both telomeraseand recombination-dependent telomere replication. This study provides a mechanistic link between histone H2B ubiquitination and telomere replication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据