4.8 Article

Enhancing multiplex genome editing by natural transformation (MuGENT) via inactivation of ssDNA exonucleases

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 12, 页码 7527-7537

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx496

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health [AI118863, GM109259]
  2. Indiana University College of Arts and Sciences Startup Funds
  3. European Research Council under the European Community [281590]
  4. Indiana University Startup Funds
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [281590] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, we described a method for multiplex genome editing by natural transformation (MuGENT). Mutant constructs for MuGENT require large arms of homology (>2000 bp) surrounding each genome edit, which necessitates laborious in vitro DNA splicing. In Vibrio cholerae, we uncover that this requirement is due to cytoplasmic ssDNA exonucleases, which inhibit natural transformation. In ssDNA exonuclease mutants, one arm of homology can be reduced to as little as 40 bp while still promoting integration of genome edits at rates of similar to 50% without selection in cis. Consequently, editing constructs are generated in a single polymerase chain reaction where one homology arm is oligonucleotide encoded. To further enhance editing efficiencies, we also developed a strain for transient inactivation of the mismatch repair system. As a proof-of-concept, we used these advances to rapidly mutate 10 high-affinity binding sites for the nucleoid occlusion protein SlmA and generated a duodecuple mutant of 12 diguanylate cyclases in V. cholerae. Whole genome sequencing revealed little to no off-target mutations in these strains. Finally, we show that ssDNA exonucleases inhibit natural transformation in Acinetobacter bay-lyi. Thus, rational removal of ssDNA exonucleases may be broadly applicable for enhancing the efficacy and ease of MuGENT in diverse naturally transformable species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据