4.8 Article

DNA residence time is a regulatory factor of transcription repression

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 19, 页码 11121-11130

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx728

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [GE 2631/1-1]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [637987 ChromArch, 638573 SILENCE]
  3. German Research Foundation (Emmy Noether Programme) [UH 275 1/1]
  4. German Academic Scholarship Foundation
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  6. ERC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcription comprises a highly regulated sequence of intrinsically stochastic processes, resulting in bursts of transcription intermitted by quiescence. In transcription activation or repression, a transcription factor binds dynamically to DNA, with a residence time unique to each factor. Whether the DNA residence time is important in the transcription process is unclear. Here, we designed a series of transcription repressors differing in their DNA residence time by utilizing the modular DNA binding domain of transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) and varying the number of nucleotide-recognizing repeat domains. We characterized the DNA residence times of our repressors in living cells using single molecule tracking. The residence times depended non-linearly on the number of repeat domains and differed by more than a factor of six. The factors provoked a residence time-dependent decrease in transcript level of the glucocorticoid receptor-activated gene SGK1. Down regulation of transcription was due to a lower burst frequency in the presence of long binding repressors and is in accordance with a model of competitive inhibition of endogenous activator binding. Our single molecule experiments reveal transcription factor DNA residence time as a regulatory factor controlling transcription repression and establish TALE-DNA binding domains as tools for the temporal dissection of transcription regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据