4.8 Article

GibbsCluster: unsupervised clustering and alignment of peptide sequences

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 W1, 页码 W458-W463

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx248

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HHSN272201200010C]
  2. Department for International Development of the United
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1078791]
  4. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas
  5. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica, Argentina [PICT-2012-0115]
  6. Argentinean national research council (CONICET)
  7. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Receptor interactions with short linear peptide fragments (ligands) are at the base of many biological signaling processes. Conserved and information-rich amino acid patterns, commonly called sequence motifs, shape and regulate these interactions. Because of the properties of a receptor-ligand system or of the assay used to interrogate it, experimental data often contain multiple sequence motifs. GibbsCluster is a powerful tool for unsupervised motif discovery because it can simultaneously cluster and align peptide data. The GibbsCluster 2.0 presented here is an improved version incorporating insertion and deletions accounting for variations in motif length in the peptide input. In basic terms, the program takes as input a set of peptide sequences and clusters them into meaningful groups. It returns the optimal number of clusters it identified, together with the sequence alignment and sequence motif characterizing each cluster. Several parameters are available to customize cluster analysis, including adjustable penalties for small clusters and overlapping groups and a trash cluster to remove outliers. As an example application, we used the server to deconvolute multiple specificities in large-scale peptidome data generated by mass spectrometry. The server is available at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/GibbsCluster-2.0.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据