4.8 Article

Competition between translation initiation factor elF5 and its mimic protein 5MP determines non-AUG initiation rate genome-wide

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 20, 页码 11941-11953

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx808

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health [R01AG042400, R01GM1222814]
  2. KSU open access fund
  3. NSF Research Grant [1412250]
  4. FRQ-S
  5. KSU
  6. Innovative Award from Terry Johnson Cancer Center
  7. JSPS
  8. KU-COBRE Protein Structure and Function Pilot Grant [P30GM110761]
  9. Heiwa Nakajima Foundation
  10. [P20GM103418]
  11. [55108556]
  12. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K13314] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the human genome, translation initiation from non-AUG codons plays an important role in various gene regulation programs. However, mechanisms regulating the non-AUG initiation rate remain poorly understood. Here, we show that the non-AUG initiation rate is nearly consistent under a fixed nucleotide context in various human and insect cells. Yet, it ranges from <1% to nearly 100% compared to AUG translation, depending on surrounding sequences, including Kozak, and possibly additional nucleotide contexts. Mechanistically, this range of non-AUG initiation is controlled in part, by the elF5-mimic protein (5MP). 5MP represses non-AUG translation by competing with elF5 for the Met-tRNAi-binding factor elF2. Consistently, elF5 increases, whereas 5MP decreases translation of NAT1/EIF4G2/DAP5, whose sole start codon is GUG. By modulating elF5 and 5MP1 expression in combination with ribosome profiling we identified a handful of previously unknown non-AUG initiation sites, some of which serve as the exclusive start codons. If the initiation rate for these codons is low, then an AUG-initiated downstream ORF prevents the generation of shorter, AUG- initiated isoforms. We propose that the homeostasis of the non-AUG translatome is maintained through balanced expression of elF5 and 5MP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据