4.8 Article

Structural basis for the D-stereoselectivity of human DNA polymerase β

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 10, 页码 6228-6237

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx252

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [ES024585, ES026821]
  2. National Institutes of Health Training Grant Graduate Fellowship [T32GM008512]
  3. Pelotonia Fellowship
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  5. NIH [ES024585]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) with L-stereochemistry have long been an effective treatment for viral infections because of the strong D-stereoselectivity exhibited by human DNA polymerases relative to viral reverse transcriptases. The D-stereoselectivity of DNA polymerases has only recently been explored structurally and all three DNA polymerases studied to date have demonstrated unique stereochemical selection mechanisms. Here, we have solved structures of human DNA polymerase beta (hPol beta), in complex with single-nucleotide gapped DNA and L-nucleotides and performed pre-steady-state kinetic analysis to determine the D-stereoselectivity mechanism of hPol beta. Beyond a similar 180 degrees rotation of the L-nucleotide ribose ring seen in other studies, the pre-catalytic ternary crystal structures of hPol beta, DNA and L-dCTP or the triphosphate forms of antiviral drugs lamivudine ((-) 3TC-TP) and emtricitabine ((-) FTC-TP) provide little structural evidence to suggest that hPol beta follows the previously characterized mechanisms of D-stereoselectivity. Instead, hPol beta discriminates against L-stereochemistry through accumulation of several active site rearrangements that lead to a decreased nucleotide binding affinity and incorporation rate. The two NRTIs escape some of the active site selection through the base and sugar modifications but are selected against through the inability of hPol beta to complete thumb domain closure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据