4.6 Article

Johnson Solids: Anion-Templated Silver Thiolate Clusters Capped by Sulfonate

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 1640-1650

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201704298

关键词

Johnson solids; luminescence; silver(I) cluster; solution behavior

资金

  1. NSFC [21571115]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2014BM027, ZR2017MB061]
  3. Shandong University [2015WLJH24, 104.205.2.5, 2015JC045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfonates were incorporated into six novel high-nuclearity silver(I) thiolate clusters under the guidance of anion templates varied from S2-, SO42-, alpha-[Mo5O18](6-), beta-[Mo5O18](6-), [Mo2O8](4-), to [Mo4O14(SO4)](6-). Single crystal X-ray analysis revealed that SD/Ag1, SD/Ag3, SD/Ag5, and SD/Ag6 are discrete [S@Ag-60], [-Mo5O18@Ag-36], [Mo2O8@Ag-30](2), and [Mo4O14(SO4)@Ag-73] clusters, respectively, whereas SD/Ag2 and SD/Ag4 are one-dimensional (1D) chains based on the [SO4@Ag-20] and [-Mo5O18@Ag-36] cluster subunits, respectively. Their silver skeletons are protected exteriorly by thiolates and sulfonates and interiorly supported by diverse anions as templates. Structurally, cluster SD/Ag1 is a typical core-shell structure comprised of an inner Ag-12 cuboctahedron and an outer Ag-48 shell. The sulfate-templated drum-like Ag-20 cluster subunits are bridged by PhSO3- to give a 1D chain of SD/Ag2. Complex SD/Ag3 and SD/Ag4 are spindle-like Ag-36 clusters with isomeric [Mo5O18](6-) inside, and the latter is further extended to a 1D chain through PhSO3- bridges. A pair of [Mo2O8](4-) templated gourd-like Ag-30 clusters are dimerized in a head-to-head fashion to form SD/Ag5. Complex SD/Ag6 is the largest cluster in this family and doubly templated by unprecedented [Mo4O14(SO4)](6-) anions. Geometrically, the silver shells of SD/Ag1-SD/Ag5 show the polyhedral features of Johnson solids, instead of the usual Platonic or Archimedean solids. Solution behaviors and luminescent properties were also investigated in detail.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据