4.6 Article

High performance few-layer MoS2 transistor arrays with wafer level homogeneity integrated by atomic layer deposition

期刊

2D MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/aa9ea5

关键词

atom layer deposition; molybdenum disulfide; wafer-scale; uniformity; field-effect transistor; mobility

资金

  1. NSFC [61522404, 61474029, 61427901, 61704030]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program [17PJ1400500]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program [2015AA016501]
  4. National Major Projects of Science and Technology [2017ZX02315005]
  5. Support Plans for the Youth Top-Notch Talents of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wafer-level integration of 2D transition metal disulfide is the key factor for future large-scale integration of the continuously scaling-down devices, and has attracted great attention in recent years. Compared with other ultra-thin film growth methods, atomic layer deposition (ALD) has the advantages of excellent step coverage, uniformity and thickness controllability. In this work, we synthesized large-scale and thickness-controllable MoS2 films on sapphire substrate by ALD at 150 degrees C with molybdenum hexcarbonyl and hexamethyldisilathiane (HMDST) as precursors followed by high-temperature annealing in sulfur atmosphere. HMDST is introduced for the first time to enable a toxic-free process without hazardous sulfur precursors such as H2S and CH3SSCH3. The synthesized MoS2 retains the inherent benefits from the ALD process, including thickness controllability, reproducibility, wafer-level thickness uniformity, and high conformity. Finally, fieldeffect transistor (FET) arrays were fabricated based on the large-area ALD MoS2 films. The top-gate FETs exhibited excellent electrical performance such as high on/off current ratio over 103 and peak room-temperature mobility up to 11.56 cm(2) V-1 s(-1). This work opens up an attractive approach to realize the application of high-quality 2D materials with wafer scale homogeneity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据