4.7 Article

Protein DeterminationMethod Matters

期刊

FOODS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods7010005

关键词

proteins; amino acids; analytical methods; extraction methods; Kjeldahl; Bradford; Lowry

资金

  1. Publication Fund of UIT The Arctic University of Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reported protein content of foods depends on the analytical method used for determination, making a direct comparison between studies difficult. The aim of this study was to examine and compare protein analytical methods. Some of these methods require extraction preceding analysis. The efficacy of protein extraction differs depending on food matrices and thus extraction yield was determined. Overall, most analytical methods overestimated the protein contents. The inaccuracies were linked to indirect measurements, i.e., nitrogen determination and subsequent conversion to protein, or interference from other chemical substances. Amino acid analysis is the only protein analysis method where interfering substances do not affect the results. Although there is potential for improvement in regards to the hydrolysis method, we recommend that this method should be the preferred for food protein determination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据