4.7 Article

Exploring the validity of time-concentration superposition in glassy colloids: Experiments and simulations

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 98, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.98.062602

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1133279, CBET-1506072, CBET-1506079]
  2. John R. Bradford endowment at Texas Tech University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superposition approaches have generally been proposed to create a dynamic rheological map to access colloidal glassy dynamics beyond experimental time windows. However, the validity of the superposition approaches in colloids near the glass transition is questionable owing to the well-known emergence of a beta-relaxation process there. Here, we employ a time-concentration superposition (TCS) approach, analogous to time-temperature superposition and TCS approaches in molecular systems, utilizing a combination of macroscopic rheological experiments and microscopic Brownian dynamics simulations, where concentration jumps are performed by a sudden growth of particle size [soft polystyrene-poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) particles in experiment and nearly hard spheres in simulation] at a fixed number of particles. We have examined whether a characteristic master curve can be obtained through horizontal and vertical shifting of the dynamic data, finding that TCS does not hold for either the experimental or simulation systems. We identify the origin of this breakdown as not only the emergence of a strong beta-relaxation process but also its overlap with the alpha relaxation in both the experimental soft-sphere and the simulated nearly hard-sphere colloids near the glass transition concentration. Further understanding of the lack of validity of TCS results from analysis of both experimental and simulation data in the framework of the Baumgaertel-Schausberger-Winter (BSW) relaxation spectrum which provide a means to determine the concentration dependences of both the alpha and the beta relaxations, which seem to follow TCS themselves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据