4.5 Article

Involvement of MEK/ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt Pathways in the Refractory Behavior of GH3B6 Pituitary Tumor Cells to the Inhibitory Effect of TGFβ1

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 156, 期 2, 页码 534-547

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2014-1070

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas
  3. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnologia de la Universidad Nacional de Cordoba

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pituitary tumor cells have a poor response to the growth inhibitory effect of TGF beta 1, possibly resulting from the cross talk of TGF beta/Smads signal with other signaling pathways, an undescribed mechanism in these tumoral cells. To address this hypothesis, we investigated whether the mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK)/ERK1/2 and phosphoinositide-3 kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt) pathways were able to regulate the antimitogenic effect of TGF beta 1 on GH3B6 cells. TGF beta 1 treatment decreased the cell proliferation and induced an activation of mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2/3 (Smad2/3), effects that were potentiated by MEK and PI3K inhibitors, thus indicating the existence of a cross talk between TGF beta 1/Smad with the MEK/ERK1/2 or PI3K/Akt pathways. In addition, through immunoprecipitation assays, a direct interaction was observed between Smad2/3-ERK1/2 and Smad2/3-Akt, which decreased when the GH3B6 cells were incubated with TGF beta 1 in the presence of MEK or PI3K inhibitors, thereby suggesting that the ERK1/2- and Akt-activated states were involved. These Smad2/3-ERK1/2 and Smad2/3-Akt associations were also confirmed by confocal and transmission electron microscopy. These findings indicate that the TGF beta 1-antimitogenic effect in GH3B6 cells was attenuated by the MEK/ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt pathways via modulating Smad2/3 phosphorylation. This molecular mechanism could explain in part the refractory behavior of pituitary tumor cells to the inhibitory effect of TGF beta 1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据