4.5 Article

Modeling of spacer grid mixing effects through mixing vane crossflow model in subchannel analysis

期刊

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
卷 320, 期 -, 页码 141-152

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.05.003

关键词

Crossflow; Mixing vane; Model improvement; Subchannel analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spacer grids, especially those with mixing vanes or other mixing devices in the rod bundle, have great influence on local flow fields in the reactor core. This mixing effect has been demonstrated by both experimental and numerical simulations, however, the spacer grids' effect on flow field is not well reflected in most subchannel codes that are currently used as main instruments in calculating local conditions and safety analysis for the nuclear industry. This paper focuses on improvement of the mixing vane crossflow model in subchannel analysis for simulating the mixing effects of spacer grids. The distributed resistance method (DRM) is applied, and the source terms associated with the spacer grids are added to momentum equations to account for the mixing vane grids' influence on local flow fields in rod bundles (U.S. patent, application number: 61841961, confirmation number: 8224; U.S. patent, application number: 62375023, confirmation number: 2306; Chinese patent, application number: 201611179395.1). The improved DRM model is used to analyze the thermal hydraulic performance in the 5 x 5 rod bundle. The calculation results are compared with experimental data and CFD simulation results respectively. The subchannel calculation results are also compared with those from the conventional code without the DRM model. The flow characteristics, such as the crossflow direction, the crossflow values at grid zone, and the decay trend of the crossflow downstream of the mixing vane grid are analyzed. The improved mixing vane crossflow model is assessed by comparison analysis, and some conclusions are obtained. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据