3.8 Article

Automated end-to-end blood testing at the point-of-care: Integration of robotic phlebotomy with downstream sample processing

期刊

TECHNOLOGY
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 59-66

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S2339547818500048

关键词

Medical Robotics; Venous Access; Point-of-Care Blood Testing; Microscale Sample Processing; Centrifugal Microfluidics

资金

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health [R01-EB020036]
  2. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-0937373]
  3. GAANN Training Program in Emerging Areas of Precision and Personalized Medicine [P200A150131]
  4. NIH/NIGMS Rutgers Biotechnology Training Program [T32 GM008339]
  5. NIH F31 Predoctoral Fellowship [EB018191]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diagnostic blood testing is the most commonly performed clinical procedure in the world, and influences the majority of medical decisions made in hospital and laboratory settings. However, manual blood draw success rates are dependent on clinician skill and patient physiology, and results are generated almost exclusively in centralized labs from large-volume samples using labor-intensive analytical techniques. This paper presents a medical device that enables end-to-end blood testing by performing blood draws and providing diagnostic results in a fully automated fashion at the point-of-care. The system couples an image-guided venipuncture robot, developed to address the challenges of routine venous access, with a centrifuge-based blood analyzer to obtain quantitative measurements of hematology. We first demonstrate a white blood cell assay on the analyzer, using a blood mimicking fluid spiked with fluorescent microbeads, where the area of the packed bead layer is correlated with the bead concentration. Next we perform experiments to evaluate the pumping efficiency of the sample handling module. Finally, studies are conducted on the integrated device - from blood draw to analysis - using blood vessel phantoms to assess the accuracy and repeatability of the resulting white blood cell assay.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据