4.6 Article

Bound acoustic modes in the radiation continuum in isotropic layered systems without periodic structures

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 97, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.014108

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-00ER15087]
  2. South African National Research Foundation [80798]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-00ER15087] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the existence of guided acoustic modes in layered structures whose phase velocity is higher than that of bulk waves in a solid substrate or an adjacent fluid half space, which belong to the class of bound states in the radiation continuum (BICs). We demonstrate that in contrast to the electromagnetic case, non-symmetry-protected BICs exist in isotropic layered systems without periodic structures. Two systems supporting non-symmetry-protected sagittally polarized BICs have been identified: (i) a supported solid layer yields BICs whose phase velocity is higher than the transverse velocity of the substrate but lower than the longitudinal velocity; (ii) a supported solid layer loaded by a fluid half space supports BICs whose velocity is higher that the bulk velocity of the fluid but lower than acoustic velocities of the substrate. The latter case is a unique example of BICs in the sense that it does not involve an evanescent field in the fluid half space providing the radiation continuum. In either case, BICs are represented by isolated points in the dispersion relations located within leaky branches. We show that these BICs are robust with respect to small perturbations of the system parameters. Numerical results are provided for realistic materials combinations. We also show that no BICs exist in all-fluid layered structures, whereas in solid layered structures there are no shear horizontal BICs and no sagittally polarized BICs whose velocity exceeds the longitudinal velocity of the substrate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据