4.7 Article

Graphene oxide nanomaterials for the removal of non-ionic surfactant from water

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.01.072

关键词

Graphene oxide; Adsorption; Non-ionic surfactant; Purification; Recycling

资金

  1. Research Supporting Foundation of the State of Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2015/07033-7, 2015/07773-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of surfactants in aquatic environment is a major public health concern. Recently, several methods have been developed to remove these compounds, among these are the adsorption processes. The great challenge of this technology is to achieve high removal capacities, fast adsorption and efficient adsorbent recoveries. The aim of our study was to synthesize GO and rGO and use them for non-ionic surfactant (TX-100) adsorption in consecutive cycles. Both nanomaterials were synthesized and characterized by several analyses including BET method for superficial area, XRD, Raman Spectroscopy, CP/MAS 13C NMR, TGA, FT-IR, XPS, SEM and TEM microscopies. The optimization of the adsorption process was performed by varying many parameters, including the experiment time, nanomaterials/surfactant ratio, temperature, pH and ultrasound irradiation. GO and rGO showed fast TX-100 adsorption, about 30 min to reach equilibrium. The experiments showed that the pH variation affects the removal efficiency for both nanomaterials with pH 6 being the optimized condition. The pseudo-second order kinetic model showed the best fit to the experimental data for both nanomaterials. The equilibrium data for GO and rGO were fitted to the Fowler-Guggenheim and the Langmuir models, respectively. The rGO was verified as the best adsorbent for TX-100 removal, suggesting that hydrophobic and pi-stacking interactions are dominant in the process. Besides the superior adsorption efficiency, rGO formed larger aggregates after TX-100 removal than GO, facilitating its separation from solution. Under optimized conditions, GO and rGO revealed superior removal capacities when compared to others adsorbents (1203 and 1683 mg/g, respectively).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据