4.6 Article

A highly sensitive flexible metal-organic framework sets a new benchmark for separating propyne from propylene

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 6, 期 47, 页码 24452-24458

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta08198k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LZ18B060001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21725603]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals
  4. Research Computing Center in College of Chemical and Biological Engineering at Zhejiang University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The stepwise adsorption behavior endows flexible metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with theoretically high separation selectivity; however, their practical separation performance for gas mixtures is frequently far inferior to the theoretical value from pure-component sorption isotherms due to their retarded and unpredictable response to gas molecules under the mixed gas environment, especially for trace gas removal. Here we reported a novel and highly sensitive flexible MOF (TIFSIX-14-Cu-i, also termed as ZU-13) featuring ultra-low propyne (C3H4) threshold pressure for efficient separation of trace C3H4 from propylene (C3H6), a critical step to produce polymer-grade C3H6. We revealed how exerting threshold pressure control in anion-pillared flexible materials enabled ultra-high sensitivity to targeted C3H4 molecules as well as obvious exclusion of C3H6 molecules through precise control of the hydrogen-bonding interaction between organic linkers and anion pillars. The designed TIFSIX-14-Cu-i with ultra-low C3H4 threshold pressure (500 ppm) not only exhibited exceptionally high C3H4/C3H6 selectivity (355) but also set a new benchmark for the separation of 1/99 C3H4/C3H6 mixtures (1280 mL g(-1) with C3H6 purity over 99.9999%) in breakthrough experiments without disturbing the leakage phenomenon. The underlying mechanism of sensitive flexible MOFs for C3H4/C3H6 separation was revealed by density functional theory calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据